by PF

Here’s a comment which has blossomed into a full-fledged blog post!

Notus Wind wrote:

I am convinced that moral cowardice is a bigger problem for us than guilt.

Morality is not the basis for a social movement. It is a way to control people based on shapes that appear on the frontiers of our knowledge. New knowledge immediately overturns previously existing moral structures, if anyone was keeping score of these ghostly entities, their carcasses are strewn all over every path of knowledge acquisition like the molted exoskeletons of insects.

Social morality is the imposition of a ‘should’ without the understanding of an ‘is’ - one party telling another to do something on the basis of its own authority, not of any understanding. If you didn’t know what an electric socket was, and I told you not to stick a fork in there, but I’m not telling you why - that is what traditional morality has been. No explanation forthcoming, no free choice involved, authority cited as justification. If I convey to you knowledge that its an electric socket, then your choice not to stick a fork in it becomes strategic - and no longer moral.

The extent to which I understand what is going on, to that extent I can act strategically. To the extent that I don’t understand what is going on and have to borrow and imitate from other people, is the extent that I am being ‘moral’.

READ MORE...

Richard Barnbrook has announced on his blog that he has resigned the BNP whip in the GLA because of the persistent allegations of financial impropriety at the top of the party:

... The serious nature of these allegations are such that they must be the subject of an internal independent and transparent BNP investigation to ascertain the truth or otherwise of the allegations.

I have decided therefore that until these allegations are investigated fully by an independent panel of British National Party officers and members and are revealed as either true or false, that I cannot continue to represent the BNP in the Greater London Assembly.

I am therefore resigning the BNP whip with immediate effect and will now sit as an independent member of the London Assembly.

I am not resigning my British National Party membership.

I remain a loyal British National Party member and continue to serve the party and its members that I hold so dear to my heart.

Once this internal and independent British National Party investigation reports back its findings, and I can go back to my constituents and fellow party members and report that the allegations are not true, then I will immediately recommence representing the British National Party on the GLA.

Barnbrook’s gesture followed hard on the heels of another elected BNP councillor, Graham Partner, resigning the whip to sit as an independent on Leicestershire County Council and for North West Leicestershire District Council.  It appears that there is a continuing impetus for reform inside and outside the party.  This has to be allowed to run its course.  If it does not produce change ... if Griffin and his aids retain their grip on the party, then minds will turn to the necessity of establishing an alternative party.

The next few months are going to be critical for nationalism in this country.

This piece is authored by my friend DanielJ, who is someone I am proud to say I have met and like, and regard as a brother in the cause if not, as he might regard me despite myself, in Christ (or perhaps he wouldn’t!)  The article appeared yesterday in the Summer 2010 edition of The Kinist Review.
GW

KINISM:THE ONE AND THE MANY

DanielJ

And He has made all nations of men of one blood to dwell on all the face of the earth, ordaining fore-appointed seasons and boundaries of their dwelling … (Act 17:26)

Adam was created directly by God in the express image and likeness of God. The Godhead conspired to create, and after naming man, declared that the express purpose in their creation of man was the ruling, classifying, dominance and administration of creation. Although God created man in His own image and His own likeness, Adam has left to us—his children—a legacy of death and a fallen nature. After the fall, Adam and Eve gave birth to children that were born in their own image and in their own totally depraved likeness rather than the direct likeness and image of God.

This is an account of the births of Adam: In the day of God’s preparing man, in the likeness of God He hath made him; a male and a female He hath prepared them, and He blesseth them, and calleth their name Man, in the day of their being prepared. And Adam liveth an hundred and thirty years, and begetteth a son in his likeness, according to his image, and calleth his name Seth. (Gen 5:1-3)

We are, therefore, born into a covenant of death under a covenant head who has passed unto to us nothing but sin, death, and decay. We are all, by virtue of this inheritance, corrupt and headed for perdition. We, the many, of every tribe on Earth, are of the Adamic kind and in need of the one—represented in Scripture by Seth—to save us from our sins. Scripture tells us of the battle between these two seeds: “And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and her Seed; He will bruise your head, and you shall bruise His heel.” (Gen 3:15) Furthermore, Scripture states:

“Christ redeemed us from the curse of the Law, being made a curse for us (for it is written, “Cursed is everyone having been hanged on a tree”); so that the blessing of Abraham might be to the nations in Jesus Christ, and that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith. Brothers, I speak according to man, a covenant having been ratified, even among mankind, no one sets aside or adds to it. And to Abraham and to his Seed the promises were spoken. It does not say, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, “And to your Seed,” which is Christ. (Gal 3:13-16)

READ MORE...

by I. Bismuth

August 4: Today we arrived back at Terminal Five after three weeks of ethical holiday-making in a land replete with victimhood. On the drive into central London we were struck by the contrast between the still extensive tracts of unoccupied greenery even between Heathrow and home, and the overpopulated khaki aridity, beyond the tourist pools, of the whole of the country we had left a few hours earlier.

We feel it must be obvious to anyone with a serious commitment to Anti-Racism that the principle by which specific good things, such as houses and medical care, are allocated to individuals and families on the basis of need, is crying out to be extended to whole populations and to more general good things, such as countries. There can be no doubt that the islands off the northwest coast of Europe are in the category of general good things and that populations trapped in sub-standard parts of the world need them, and need them now. We are confident that when the remaining racist objections (always masquerading as common sense) are finally overcome, these populations will, albeit belatedly, be allocated the general good things they need.

August 5: Since our holiday would spare Hilda any cooking, tea-making, bed-making, boiler-repairing, bath-running, silver-polishing, floor-scrubbing, and washing and ironing, we thought she could make herself useful by redecorating the house, and now that we have had a chance to inspect the new Zuber wallpaper and the gleaming woodwork, I must say she has done a job for which any professional would be only too anxious to submit a bill.

READ MORE...

by Trainspotter

I’ve had a recurring vision for some time now, and I’m no longer certain as to whether it is a dream or a fantasy.  I only know that I cannot forget it.  In this vision, we have won.  Victory is complete and total, our own land for our own people. The tribe, our tribe, is free to breathe with deep lungs.  There are pretty girls to be admired, songs to be sung.  Our songs, the way only we can sing them.  Great vistas open up before us, and there is the inescapable feeling that thousands of years have somehow been won.  The past,  present, and future, the call of the stars.  The magnitude of it all is, quite simply, staggering. 

Yet, in this vision, I am drawn away from the joy, in fact I don’t feel it at all, at least not for long.  No, that’s not right.  Not at all.  There is a task at hand, something that has been weighing upon me for a long time, no longer to be ignored. There is a grave to visit, a grave from another world.  A world now mercifully dead and buried, but a world that still leaves its stain, its mark.  Channon and Christopher’s graves. 

I go to the grave site, but what can be said? Do I not fancy myself as something of an orator?  Yet, in this vision, words fail me, they tire me, they embarrass me.  They seem so utterly ridiculous and patronizing, and most anything that I could say would be a preposterous lie, dishonoring me and them.  Yet I know what has to be said, that and nothing else.  The words are inescapable, they force themselves upon me.  “We came too late.”  That’s it, but now again.  “We came too late.”

Those words, those four words, are the only ones spoken in this dream of mine. I find that these four words impose themselves upon me, one way or another, all too often these days. 

I look at my nephews and nieces, and I can’t help but smile.  Really great kids, I think the world of them.  It’s not too far from the truth to say that they worship me; I’m by far their favorite uncle.  I think they feel about me the same way that, in my own childhood, I felt about an older cousin.  He was a God walking on earth, a hero among mere mortals, as far as I was concerned.

Yet, what does the future hold?  These children will be, in fact already are, subjected to daily assault by our most dedicated enemies.  One niece in particular, not even three, is the Nordic archetype.  A truly beautiful child, striking to strangers.  I know that every effort will be made to separate her from her people, to make her despise them, or at least instill indifference.  A mere ten or so years from now, she could be gyrating to the most noxious Negro music, her head filled with the most repugnant thoughts. This child, and millions more like her, innocent and by all rights entitled to a sane world governed by her own people, stands as sheep ready for the slaughter.  Is it my fate to become the weird uncle, the crank, the strange symbol of a dying people that the young can only look at with derision and wonder?  Is that it?  Is that where this is heading?

I feel something similar whenever I see young white children these days.  Can we win in time? Without thinking, I do the simple math, it’s automatic now. 

“O.K., let’s see, this child has about ten years left before being thrown to the wolves.  Can we win by then?  Will we be too late?”

The bottom line is that we are running out of time.  The body count keeps growing, the river of blood continues to rise but is never sated.  Our people are being destroyed in countless ways, great and small.  For how many more victims, for how many more families, must we say, “We came too late?” 

I have made no secret of my conviction that, in order to win, the cultural ground must be prepared first.  Until street activists start reporting real success and a true resonance with our message, we will know that we must do better. Ultimately, that’s the proof that we need, the only proof that matters.  It is our job to do what we can to develop appealing, winning white nationalist ideas, and spread them to the best of our ability. 

We must develop ideas that are capable of challenging the status quo and existing norms, and we must do it soon.  To that end, I propose a project, namely one post a week for fifty weeks.  Each post will cover a distinct topic, each building upon the last.  The “50” should, to the extent practicable, be comprehensive, dealing with everything from ontology to economics, from first principles to strategy and tactics, from evolutionary psychology to political systems.  I realize that is a lot for 50 topics, which is why the single most important part of this project is at the beginning, coming up with the “50” questions or propositions.  Then, unleash the carnivores of majorityrights, hammer it out, and move on to the next topic in the following week. 

I realize the limitations of handling things this way, and it will only work with meaningful collaboration.  But we’ve got to impose some sort of structure on ourselves, and some type of time limit.  This project, by its nature, imposes both.  I am not proposing “philosophy by committee,” though it might seem that way at first.  Whoever hosts this will, ultimately, have to make the final call.  Personally, I believe that others may be better suited for this task than I.  Certainly guessedworker and Greg Johnson come to mind, just for starters.  I understand that Haller is working on something, so maybe he would be interested.  However, I am willing to do it. 

The first task is to come up with the comprehensive “50.” If there is interest in this project, please submit any ideas for the list on this thread.  Feel free to offer just one, or your entire list of 50.  The more the merrier.  If I’m doing this, I will synthesize the suggestions, and come up with the final 50.  Again, the idea is that the 50 topics should provide a comprehensive overview of who we are, where we are going, and ultimately how to get there.  We’ve only got 50, so we’ve got to make them count.  I’m stronger in some areas than others, so if the list were left entirely to me, I think some important areas will find themselves neglected.  I hope to avoid that. 

Let’s do this, for all that have come before us and for generations yet unborn.  Let us at least try, for even if we fail in this particular task, it will only free us up for another approach.  We will not quit. 

For many victims of the butcher, we will never escape the stain of “We came too late.”  What’s done, most tragically, has been done. Our losses, while already grievous, compare as nothing to the good that we may accomplish.  Just as our past stretches back into the primordial mists of time, so too may future generations of our tribe journey into worlds distant and far.  It is up to us to see that they will have an existence at all. 

So much is at stake here and, though we did not choose it to be so, all signs point to our fate largely being determined in the years ahead.  Like it or not, it’s our fight.  Perhaps we are, or can be, what the Germans once called a “community of fate.” Let’s make the most of it, for the good of the tribe. 

For Victory In Our Time,

Trainspotter

by The Narrator

This is an assessment (aka, a rant) of where America currently is, circa 2010, and where it is headed, save an asteroid strike.  Europe, you’re only a step or two behind.

The first thing to mention, of course, is that America has a black president by the name of Barack Hussein Obama. Let that sink in for a second.

That, in and of itself, is beyond any possible conception of reality most Americans could have imagined in their most grim of nightmares just twenty years ago. Twenty years! That’s 1990!

But then, just twenty years ago (1990!), America was still in the neighborhood of 70 to 75% White. Again, just twenty years ago.

Equally inconceivable to Americans back then, is the notion that everything from customer service over the phone to the directions on a can of soup would be in Spanish as well as English.

Of course some will point out that people were seeing such things in places like Los Angeles or New York and warning of the coming storm. And that’s true. But at that time the clouds on the horizon were not yet in range of 99% of Americans view (America is a big place). By the time they were, the proverbial rains we’re already pounding down.

Besides that, the fact that some were warning of the coming storm twenty years ago (and even earlier) and, well, here we are never the less.  It should give us all pause in our feverish excitement about some politician “voicing concern” or some new book explaining the direness of our plight.

On demographics, it’s truly difficult to ascertain the real situation. Officially, America is still over 60% “white” (“white” being those of European, middle-eastern and north African heritage, as per the Census definition).  Unofficially the percentages don’t match up with what you see with your own eyes. I’ve gone into this before here, so I’ll only add now that it would be perfectly understandable for a tourist to come to the conclusion that America is about 42% White and 58% non-White.  And that’s keeping in mind that in 1965 America was around 90% White, and that all of this has happened without any opposition whatsoever. Not one single leader came forward to oppose the most destructive agenda in human history. Not one!

READ MORE...

by Cladrastis

What we REQUIRE is a sea change in leadership – from a self-serving “universalist” kleptocracy to an altruistic and philosophically-rooted particularist aristocracy; an aristocracy that will place the interests of the nation before the personal interests of the individuals who are a part it. Apropos we must address two related questions: how do we bring about such a change within the extant political framework, and what will prevent an ultra-nationalist European aristocracy from sliding inexorably back into the oblivion of plutocracy?

We will “fix” the plutocratic system by instituting policies that invert the relationship between political and economic power. For a man to attain political power he will be forced to make economic sacrifices commensurate with the rank to which he aspires. Similarly, the rich man will lose political rights based on the degree to which he has amassed personal wealth. Such an inverted relationship between economic and political power lends itself naturally to James Bowery’s idea of the net asset tax, but in this instance, the tax incurs political as well as economic costs.

Intellectuals, who rarely amass great fortunes, would then emerge as one of the most promising pools of political potential. Contrariwise, individuals from the moneyed class would be eligible for office if, and only if, they relinquish their personal fortunes; by doing so, the rich man demonstrates his altruism in a tangible manner and shows the public to whom his political beneficence will be directed (does the rich man donate his money to a Guatemalan orphanage, to his sons, or to the local school system?). Notice that this encourages philanthropy, the disentangling of national and business interests, and the socialization of wealth, but also results in a certain degree transparency.

We would be wise to heed Blake’s familiar and pessimistic warning, “The iron hand crush’d the tyrant’s head, And became a tyrant in his stead,” by taking note of the forces that a tyrant do make. The rich have proven themselves time and again wholly unfit to rule. The Marxist critique of the bourgeois class is (in part) valid; however Marxists are too dishonest to accurately assess the stupidity of the dictatorship of the proletariat (in any of its theoretical permutations). Perhaps it is time to adopt the Marxist critique, but add to it an aristocratic response. Perhaps ... this is how we will prevent the Enemy from taking advantage of his next golden opportunity.

Some ten hours ago the Daily Mail placed a story on its website about the trial and sentencing of a “British-Asian” paedophile gang who forced a white girl into prostitution.  So far it is the only MSM to carry the story.

No doubt, BNP members everywhere will be saying “we told you so”, and a number of them made this point with comments in the Mail’s thread.  For their trouble they received a four-figure reward of reader ratings, which is extremely rare for this site.  However, making the same point but far out ahead of them ratings-wise, with over 2768 at the time of writing, was this remark by one Steve of County Durham:

Remember how both Channel 4 and the BNP of all people were roundly condemned as racist for trying to get the story out about mainly asian muslim men coercing, forcing, and manipulating young white girls into prostitution.

I know the liberal multi cultural do gooders will try and justify this, but i just dont care any more.

So what, aside from serendipity and the trigger-happy outrage of the average Mail reader, accounts for the thousand plus extra ratings over, say, this comment (1683) which is two below it on the thread:

Sorry to bring this up but wasnt it the BNP who tried to bring this up not so long back that girls were being groomed by Asians.Of course they were only being racist no body wanted to hear the facts dont know why! Oh yes the BNP are treated as not the best of people makes you think when compared to these people.

Or this one (1742) which is five below it:

I have a feeling that some Asians think that they live in some sort of Asian country where they can treat women like they want.

... and is the next highest scorer on the thread, which is currently 215 comments strong.

Well, it’s those last six little words, isn’t it?  The sentiment they contain goes something like: the apologists for diversity will say what they always say.  They will tell me Islam is the religion of peace, and immigration has enriched us.  They will tell me the multiracial future of Britain is “inevitable”.  They will call me a “hater” and a “xenophobe” and a “racist”, a morally illegitimate human being.  Whatever.  Nothing they can tell me will do them any good.  I just dont care any more.

Click.

This disaffection is the future.  It’s inevitablist, of course.  That is, it emerges naturally in the public sentiment, without any engineering.  So I don’t imagine there is anything the Establishment can do about it.  Certainly not liberals.  With their word tools growing more blunt and anti-productive by the day, they are simply too exhausted now to resort to argument by principle (check the thread, which is currently unmoderated).  It will be left increasingly to Africans and Asians to insist upon squatters rights, and that won’t work out at all well for them.

The only points of light for the Establishment are that the BNP is in a deep hole and the Tories are in government, from where they can always advance the Sarko stratagem if they have to.  Oh, and the demographic nightmare is still very much in train.  Other inevitablist sentiments - like “England can never be Africa, Africans can never be English” - are going to have to appear in public consciousness if the BNP cannot lead that debate.  Discourse, as ever, is war.